Search for: "BULL V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
ComerToday's case brief is Anderson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
Moreover, he had been using his mark well before Red Bull had even filed its mark. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:41 am
The post Case Preview: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
Here and hereLittle white bull hereBlack Bull hereHow to cook a bull's heart here ...... and other parts here [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20 “A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.” WLR Daily, 15th December… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The case is titled Red Bull GMBH v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:27 am
" Moreover, the definitions of "bull" as a male cow supported the contention that "cow" is used to refer to both males and females. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:08 pm
Price has posted 'Bull' Coming from the States: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Williams v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
Cariou v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
Transformative Use The modern conception of “fair use” — an independent, affirmative defense against copyright infringement that takes into account a number of factors such as the purpose of the use — does not seem to have consistently established itself in US courts until the mid-1950s. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 7:24 am
v=YGl-s-FzsFI Image courtesy of midjourney from the prompt: "US China chip war EUV" Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1989 decision of Mazzeo v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:10 am
StreetCar ORV, LLC d/b/a American Expedition Vehicles v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
Visual and conceptual similarity was also found in relation to Big Horn’s blue and silver geometric device and Red Bull’s blue and silver parallelogram device (using approximately the same colour distributions, with angular geometric shapes and central yellow sun element), and in relation to Big Horn’s single ram and Red Bull’s single bull mark.Link between the signs and the trade marks to constitute unfair advantageBacon QC took into… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
Red Bull claimed that the signs used by Big Horn on its energy drinks infringed Red Bull’s trade marks. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
It alleges that the defendants have used (in advertising):The hashtag #betterthanredbull in various posts on the Rich Energy Instagram, Facebook and Twitter pages; The signs WINGS and GIVES YOU WINGS as part of "FORGET THE WINGS" and "FORGET WINGS RICH ENERGY GIVES YOU HORNS" on the Rich Energy Facebook page and website; and The sign BULL as part of "NO BULL", "No Bull... [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155 (Ch) told us that this required the global assessment so beloved of the Court of Justice, taking into account all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
