Search for: "BURGER v. RICHARDS" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, President Richard Nixon nominated Warren Burger to be the 15th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
   Rules or no rules, it is an outrage against justice to learn from recently-released Nixon White House tapes that Nixon and then-Chief Justice Warren Burger (placed on the Supreme Court after Nixon nominated him)  discussed and commiserated on the landmark Miller v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Your book opens with a photograph of Earl Warren standing in front of the Court flanked by Richard Nixon and Warren Burger. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
That a supposedly conservative, southern appointee of Republican President Richard M. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Fuchsberg Law Center, has posted The Fiftieth Anniversary of Warren Burger's Appointment as Chief Justice on the website of the Richard Nixon Foundation, which will host a conference on the Burger Court at the Nixon Presidential Library in Yorba Linda, CA, in 2020. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:09 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Twenty-five years later, Burger’s view seems as quaint as a powdered wig. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm by Anthony Gaughan
If faced with a momentous case testing the limits of presidential power, could the Roberts Court find common ground as the Burger Court did 44 years ago? [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
I think the answer is no, but he joined a dissenting opinion, written by Chief Justice Roberts, in Armour v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Supreme Court weighed in as well, and on July 24, 1974, Chief Justice Burger announced the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]