Search for: "BUTLER v. US " Results 21 - 40 of 823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2010, 3:25 pm by Howard Knopf
 Interestingly, the revised version, which I understand dates from December 7, 2010, omits the reference to the six part test from the SCC in CCH v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Co-blogger Eugene Volokh recently cited the 1916 case of Butler v. [read post]
By Kerry Shapiro and Daniel Quinley On March 9, 2023, the US District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in Friends of the Inyo, et al., v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Paul Burrell’s website here The history of fax hereWhat the Butler Saw here and here This post originally appeared on the IPKat website [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
As we shall explain, the factual findings of the trial court compel the conclusion that appellant used his license to take advantage of an elderly and mentally infirm person to enrich himself. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:40 am by Andrew Trask
Judge Posner reiterated the same definition of predominance that he used in Butler. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Using tape-recorded testimony in an administrative proceedingMiller v Howard Safir, App. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am by Sean Wajert
See Ruggiero, 424 F.3d at 254 (noting that an expert must use reliable scientific methods to “rule in” causes); see also Best v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am by Sean Wajert
See Ruggiero, 424 F.3d at 254 (noting that an expert must use reliable scientific methods to “rule in” causes); see also Best v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am by Sean Wajert
See Ruggiero, 424 F.3d at 254 (noting that an expert must use reliable scientific methods to “rule in” causes); see also Best v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:02 pm
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 6 October 2011 My partner, labor and employment lawyer Scott Brink, has informed us that the California Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in a high-profile labor law case, Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]