Search for: "Baby Products Antitrust v." Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 4:46 am by Ted Frank
A class action against Babies "R" Us and manufacturers of upscale baby products—BabyBjorns, Britax car seats, Kids Line and Peg Perego products, Maclaren strollers, Medela breast pumps—over allegedly anticompetitive vertical price restraints has resulted in a $35.24 million settlement after the district court certified a class of consumers who purchased particular products from Toys "R" Us or Babies "R"… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
  But substantive antitrust law did not change. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:55 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
The new Third Circuit opinion, In re Baby Products Antitrust Litigation, Nos. 12-1165, 12-1166 & 12-1167, 2013 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Antitrust is focused on monopoly, not on consumer harms. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am by Maxwell Kennerly
For example, just because several products or services are being sold in a manner that demonstrates collusion among the suppliers doesn't make it "plausible" there is such collusion, said the Supreme Court in Twombly v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:41 am
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, appears at 2011-1 Trade Cases ¶77,452. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Briefing: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]