Search for: "Baca v. Colorado Department of State"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
The respondent in the Colorado case, Micheal Baca, was removed as an elector after he attempted to vote for John Kasich, even though Clinton won the popular vote in Colorado as well. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:30 am
After the vote, the Presidential Electors sued the Colorado Department of State (the Department) …. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:03 pm
Washington 19-518, Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reached the opposite conclusion in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Second, Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
” The petitioners in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:26 am
Washington & Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” At The Virginia Law Review Online, John Vlahoplus weighs in on Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
