Search for: "Bachman v. Bachman" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 6:47 am by Ted Frank
The Bachman attorneys (including Milberg LLP) have asked the court to require any objector-appellants (each of whom have about $20 at stake) to post a $325,000 appeal bond—despite the fact that Missouri law does not permit such a thing. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:19 am by Ted Frank
You will recall that the Missouri appellate court in Bachman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:12 am by Ted Frank
Louis Post-Dispatch writes about the Bachman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm by Edward Smith
Chris Caruso, a GM Engineer, testified in the case of  Lee v Silviera that the data referred to above was never designed to be used in accident reconstruction. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:05 am by RULAW Librarians
Perry's proposal that Congress would have the right to overturn a USSC decision by a 2/3 majority would mean the abrogation of Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm by Sandy Levinson
" Marshall was correct in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bachman-Richards v Pomeroy 2023 NY Slip Op 05431 Decided on October 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department is the kind of case that defendants like to point out when they argue that clients cannot be trusted. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:41 pm by Ted Frank
The good news is that the appellate court denied a motion to dismiss the appeal and held that Missouri courts would follow the federal precedent of Devlin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:32 am by Ted Frank
Milberg and several other law firms collected $21 million in quick-pay fees for a Missouri state-court class action settlement that provided face value of $39 million to the class, most of which was in $8.22 coupons. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm by Ted Frank
The Missouri Supreme Court today let stand an appellate court ruling that affirmed a $21 million fee award to Milberg and other class-action attorneys in a coupon settlement, without ever addressing the Center for Class Action Fairness's argument about the appropriate legal means for valuing coupons. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:06 am by Sandy Levinson
Bachman's is actually discussed rather than being dismissed as simply loony. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:34 am
The Tenth Circuit affirmed a felon in possession conviction in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Ken Lopez
Bachman, we used a visual display which featured admissions during discovery by Bachman's president of intentional trademark infringement. [read post]