Search for: "Bagley, in Re"
Results 81 - 100
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 4:06 am
Judges, when they're enforcing a rule that comes from outside themselves, might have to enforce a rule that isn't exactly the same as the reasons for the rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:27 pm
But I’d also note that some of the facile claims made in these debates – e.g., that Europe has equal environmental performance to the United States so what we’re doing must clearly be wrong – are not necessarily true. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the possibility that the Court “tipped its hand” in King v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 3:44 am
They don't have the penetration they did," said Bruce Bagley, a University of Miami professor who studies Mexico's drug cartels.President Felipe Calderon's army-led crackdown has rounded up traffickers and busted police protection rings, and the powerful Sinaloa cartel from western Mexico has muscled its way into the Arellano Felix gang's home turf.Experts say some Tijuana smugglers are breaking away and teaming up with the Sinaloa cartel on some drug deals. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
Bagley, 527 F.3d 489 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:59 pm
Now people may say Byrne, you're being paranoid and whatever. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Bagley Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0370p.06 2008/10/10 Grace Community Church v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:55 pm
If somebody talks EBITDA, put your hand on your wallet; they're a crook.To this day, Overstock.com and its CEO Patrick Byrne were never about GAAP or following SEC disclosure rules such as Regulation G governing non-GAAP accounting measures such as EBITDA. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm
Bagley, 2010 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The final edition will be out in the morning. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Koppelman makes one central point: "It isn’t abnegation for the law to stand by and let someone do what they’re entitled to do. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” As Nick Bagley writes today regarding that statement: "Your jaw should be on the floor. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In re Certified Questions, however, essentially ignored Michigan even while ostensibly discussing Michigan’s Constitution. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Houk, 08-4019 (6th Cir 12/9/2010) Defendant’s petition for habeas relief from his murder conviction and a sentence of death, is granted where: 1) the Ohio Supreme Court unreasonably applied Miranda in refusing to require the police to terminate interrogation upon exercise of the right to have a lawyer present and in allowing the police to demand involuntary answers by re-instituting the questioning without warnings; 2) the Ohio Supreme Court unreasonably applied Oregon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bagley, No. 06-3471 In a criminal case, collateral estoppel may only be invoked by the accused. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(IP finance) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Canadian Trademark Blog) (Class 46) (Ars Technica) Global - Patents Managing IP launches Green IP Award (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright PlayStation 3 video DRM: two strikes and you're out (Ars Technica) Report on the first interdisciplinary research workshop on free culture (Creative Commons) Australia Australia's innovation review - an IP joke (IP Think Tank) Australia considers… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
” But we’re still left with the phrase “established by a state” that is repeated in Section 1401. [read post]
