Search for: "Bagley v. Bagley"
Results 101 - 120
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
With its cert grant in Texas v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
” At Notice and Comment, Nicholas Bagley looks back at last month’s oral argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am
United States v Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
Rory Little previewed Mussachio v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
Bagley. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:54 am
” Commentary on the ruling comes from Nicholas Bagley at The Incidental Economist, who suggests that “the stakes of the lawsuit are high—not as high as King v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
House v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:27 pm
Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 675 n.6 (1985), it is grounded in an understanding of the prosecutor’s “‘special role … in the search for truth in criminal trial,’” Banks v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In a post at The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley weighs in on yesterday’s grant in Gobeille v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Lyle reported on the King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am
Throughout the pendency of King v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the possibility that the Court “tipped its hand” in King v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:18 am
The opinion in Kimble v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
On Halbig and statutory interpretation (with a reply to Professor Bagley) — a discussion of the Halbig decision and its significance Why the DC Circuit’s interpretation of the ACA in Halbig v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:04 pm
See Bagley v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
” In The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers whether, if the Court rules for the plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
