Search for: "Bagley v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Bagley, No. 05-3719 In a capital habeas proceeding, the denial of Petitioner's habeas petition is affirmed, where the state supreme court did not unreasonably apply federal law in holding that Petitioner's counsel was not ineffective during the penalty phase of the trial, as the evidence counsel allegedly failed to uncover would have been cumulative. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
Friday the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the petition for certiorari in King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” As Nick Bagley writes today regarding that statement: "Your jaw should be on the floor. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
In 1954, the United States Supreme Court ordered the public schools desegregated "with all deliberate speed" by 1956 in Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bagley, No. 05-4461 I'n a capital case in which petitioner was convicted of murdering his sons as they lay sleeping, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where state courts' rejection of a claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance during the penalty phase of the trial by failing adequately to investigate his mental-health history and background, was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In Texas v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:49 am
" [18] V. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Neumann v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
This provision requires that such exchanges be either state agencies or non-profits established by the state; for-profits and non-state entities need not apply. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Bagley, a partner at Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, analyze a recent U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
Potentially, a Lot of Permutations – eDiscovery Best Practices http://bit.ly/UExXjZ (Doug Austin) When It Comes to eDiscovery, Leave the Driving to Us – http://bit.ly/UyyTWW (Bob Ambrogi) Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire: Powering eDiscovery with Data Loss Prevention – http://bit.ly/XyQTqj (Allison Walton) Without Request, Delaware State Judge Orders Use of Predictive Coding in Complex Case – http://bit.ly/Xn4VLB (Robert Hilson) Why is Legal Hold Still a… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:06 am
So let me try to state it clearly one more time before we finish. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:01 am
Thus, in Steiger v. [read post]
