Search for: "Bahr v. Bahr"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From the North Dakota Supreme Court's decision Friday in Arthaud v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:27 am
Bahr to pendente lite reconsideration motions. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
Kenny, 15 A.3d 300 (N.J. 2011); Bahr v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
No. 1, 2021).Shuai Chen & Jan van Ours, Mental Health Effects of Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2021-003/V (2021)).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:39 am
The Bahrs filed two actions in ... [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:28 am
"); Bahr v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:51 pm
Bahr, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy at the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2018, 8:50 pm
" will be hosted by USPTO Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Bob Bahr, will discuss the USPTO's recently-issued memorandum implementing changes to examination procedure in view of the Federal Circuit's decision in Berkheimer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm
Patent and Trademark Office patent examining corps, Robert Bahr, the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, sought to clarify the Office's guidance regarding the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
La Secretaria del Departamento de Justicia, Wanda Vázquez Garced, y el Secretario del DSP, Héctor M. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:40 pm
Contra Michael Gabriel Vázquez González, conocido por “Negry”, y contra Héctor Adrián Vázquez Vázquez, conocido por “Nodky”, se radicaron dos cargos por violación al Artículo 5.01, tres por el Artículo 5.04 y dos por Artículo 6.01, cada uno. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:15 am
The memo sent to the patent examining corps from Robert Bahr, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, provides examiners with a discussion of McRo, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:01 pm
The memo sent to the patent examining corps from Robert Bahr, who is Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, explains that this most recent memorandum provides examiners with discussion of McRo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:44 am
Bahr explained a number of things, including the reason the USPTO has not updated patent eligibility guidance to address the pro-patent decision of the Federal Circuit in BASCOM v. [read post]
