Search for: "Bailey v Fish & Neave"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 3:38 am
Bucaria, observed as follows in upholding the amendment, which had the effect of reducing from 25% to 15% the plaintiff’s share of net attorney fees generated by open cases which settled after the amendment date (but preserved his otherwise vested 25% interest in other law firm assets): “In the absence of prohibitory provisions of the statutes or of rules of the common law relating to partnerships, or consideration of public policy, the partners . . ., as between… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:48 am
Gursky, 9 NY3d 514, 526 (2007); Bailey v. [read post]