Search for: "Bailey v. Bailey" Results 21 - 40 of 1,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Just one instance of using the N-word epithet towards an African American coworker may be severe enough to be unlawful racial harassment in violation of the FEHA (Bailey v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:03 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously holds today that even the single use of an unambiguous racial epithet (e.g., the "n-word") can potentially actionable constitute racial harassment in the workplace.In my (academic) sphere, there are differing opinions about whether it's appropriate (or wise) to use actual racial epithets, rather than a shorthand, when discussing particular cases in which those words appear. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Justin Hendrix
This is a particularly fraught area, as it opens the door to the types of risks that were at the core of the original complaint in Murthy v Missouri. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Just Security
Supreme Court and Presidential Immunity The Just Security Podcast: Presidential Immunity After Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Reviewed by Marnie Bailey Manager, Knowledge Services Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Artificial intelligence (AI) is in the news everywhere you look, with a lot of talk about its ability to replace lawyers (and librarians!) [read post]