Search for: "Bailey v. Parole Board"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
Bailey parole multiple times, he requested access to the records the board reviewed. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:37 pm
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE (Utah) U.S. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
In reaching this decision, the Court noted that the Parole Board did not abuse it discretion in granting the defendant parole. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the application of)… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
Bailey and People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
Bailey, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm
As this blog has previously noted, a prisoner can be denied parole if the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) or governor finds "some evidence of dangerousness" if there is no finding then under Haggard v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
Indiana Parole Board (NFP) - "William Lee Pallett appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The district judge held that the use of videoconferencing at Wilkins's parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 01, 2007 Bailey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
But that was then, this is now, the court tells us, the difference being that the legislature has since enacted RC 2967.28 to provide that failure to properly advise a defendant of PRC doesn’t prohibit the Parole Board from imposing it. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/820295.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
