Search for: "Bailey v. Proctor"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am
In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Castagna, 478 A.2d 807, 810 (Pa. 1984) (evidence of FDA “compliance” supported verdict for manufacturer); Bailey v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:27 pm
Proctor & Gamble, 2010 WL 728222 (S.D. [read post]
