Search for: "Baker et al" Results 21 - 40 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 4:54 am
Baker Hostetler’s Employment and Labor Group issued an Executive Alert today on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ wage and hour decision in  Sullivan et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:47 pm by Mike Shovan
Trache of Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP (Washington, D.C.) in the ABI Bankruptcy Brief, the Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in the case of Baker Botts LLP, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:34 am by John Taggart
Here are two related cases (same Plaintiff) where licensing arrangements went bad: 7E Spa Licensing Group LLC et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:09 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals – ARCO Shifts from State to Federal and No Vigor for VIMOn June 18, 2020, the court decided the case of Baker, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm by scanner1
WESTON, DALLIS HUNTER and MAGGIE HUNTER, THE REVEREND DAVID BAKER and JANA BAKER, CHARLIE SENMINIK and NANCY SEDMINIK, STANLEY C. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by Kenan Farrell
D & A LLC et al Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00446-SEB-TAB File Date:    Thursday, April 05, 2012 Plaintiff:     Microsoft Corp. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:54 am by Paul Horwitz
The folks at the Volokh Conspiracy have had a lot of valuable things to say about the tempest-of-the-week concerning Liz Cheney et al.'s ad criticizing the DOJ for not revealing more information about the so-called "Al Qaeda Seven," and criticizing the lawyers themselves for taking on this work. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 pm by Howard Knopf
Woods’ subsequent litigation against the University of Ottawa:         Woods Statement of Claim       University of  Ottawa Statement of Defence       Trial judgment in Woods et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
’), unlike the rules on sovereign immunity at issue in Al-Adsani, and they can in no way be described as external to the United States.Still, Al-Adsani and Kalogeropoulou show that the presence even of good reasons for a dismissal does not mean that there is no interference with the right of access to a court.Some other issues are specific to the various d [read post]