Search for: "Baker v. Long"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 11:14 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:14 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Email: mjordan@jhbarristers.com Direct Cell: 416-460-6823 The post <em>Baker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:59 pm
You can read the entire decision, here: Baker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:31 am
Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd and others [2011] UKSC 17; [2011] WLR (D) 132 “A workplace could be unsafe for the purposes of section 29(1) of the Factories Act 1961 if operations constantly and regularly carried on in it made it so. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
IntroductionThe recent decision in Baker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Baker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm
Sheriff Elkins never lived long enough to know his son. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
On June 22, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:29 am
In Baker v Baker, 2017 WL 314703 (M.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
I've thought for a long time that given all the attention-- deservedly -- to State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
The court held, in the alternative, that the Supreme Court's 1972 ruling in Baker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:23 am
Instead, relying on Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
[Warning: long and sad blog post ahead. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
On the one hand, Bush v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 pm
I have not blogged about the Chet Baker Pending Lists class action for a long time. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
of the journey that began with Baker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:15 pm
CV-03-02579-SRB, (9th Cir. 1/9/08), affirmed a district court's holding that insurance contract termination payments received by an insurance agent constituted ordinary income and not long-term capital gains, following Baker v.... [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:34 am
Ensuring that the case is confined to its idiosyncratic facts is in the long-term interest ensuring that Bull v Hall continues the stand for the principle that requiring business owners not to discriminate against LGBT+ is necessary in a democratic society, regardless of business owners’ religious or political beliefs to the contrary. [read post]
