Search for: "Baker v. Municipal Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Baker, the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Najam and Mathias. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Patchak v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
And this term, the Court will be hearing an abortion case, Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
At Slate, Eric Segall explains why, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Code § 36-1-3-6(a) (when a statutory provision requires a power to be exercised in a specific manner, the municipality must exercise the power in that manner).In James Butler v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen looks at the court’s recent cert grant in Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
The court’s reaffirmation in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:33 am
The Ohio Supreme Court gets the jump on its Federal counterparts, resuming oral arguments this week, with all eyes focused on Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Today, the Supreme Court will, for the ninth time, consider whether to grant certiorari in Klein v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
After lunch, the court will hear arguments in Manuel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:24 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and Janus v. [read post]
