Search for: "Baker v. People"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 10:45 am
“We would really like to see if we can put a plan together to make sure that we can do, with the courts, what needs to be done to ensure that people are protected with respect to their housing,” Baker said. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
In 2001, Miller Cassidy merged with Baker Botts, a larger, Texas-based firm, and Barrett spent another year there before leaving for academia. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Black v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am
Hardwick, Baker v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
However, in light of their recent failure in the NCA v Baker and others case, where the NCA suffered a major setback, as permission to appeal the discharge of three UWOs was denied by the Court of Appeal, they will also be wary to ensure that they do so only in the clearest of cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
The bakers all turned down the jobs on the grounds that the message sent by the proposed cakes was offensive or hateful. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
Finally, Internet companies aren’t “infringing on people’s right to speak. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:55 pm
On Title VII and employment discrimination: I have seen a remarkable amount of commentary in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2020 MBQB 88 Grammond J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), this evocation of the racist bigot played a key role in arguments by baker Jack Phillips and his amici that he was a sincere man of faith who loved everyone. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
It is helpful to read Jacobson alongside the more famous public health case the Court decided two months later: Lochner v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
