Search for: "Baker v. People" Results 281 - 300 of 1,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) Julian Assange is writing a book — and expecting to make somewhere between $1 and $2 million from it. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Ice overruled State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:11 am
Prior to ordering Howard from his car, Officer Vantlin recognized that the driver was Howard, not Baker. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:13 am
 It's one that recurs -- particularly (as here) in the nursing home context, where I imagine a nontrivial number of people die within a month of being admitted. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Baker Founder’s Society,” “Baker Founder’s Society,” and “Founder’s Society. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am by SHG
Finally, I agree with Stewart Baker that the line-drawing problem once you reject Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, Masterpiece didn't even resolve the baker's own case, as he was immediately targeted again after the Court ruled in his favor. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 2:13 pm
It is simply treated as precedent from another jurisdiction.In only one of the twenty-two cases was the state court dealing with a question that directly concerned military law: People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Stinchcombe, 1991 CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 326 Baker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
  In the New York Times, Peter Baker asks whether there is any difference between President Obama’s recent comment that he will look for a nominee with “a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people” and his discussion of “empathy” in the run-up to the nomination of Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am by .
Stinchcombe, 1991 CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 326 Baker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Baker,” which enabled him “to participate in the case instead of recusing. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]