Search for: "Baker v. Sanders" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court held that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
NO-FAULT – MALLELA DEFENSE – INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR DEFENSE – DISCOVERY OF PROVIDERS' CORPORATE STRUCTURE RECORDS Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Baker (07-219), scheduled for Wednesday, Feb. 27. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
   Gorunkati v Baker Sanders, LLC  2020 NY Slip Op 00406 Decided on January 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department is today’s example.l “The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the defendant Baker Sanders, LLC (hereinafter Baker Sanders), alleging that he retained Baker Sanders to engage in litigation to collect no-fault insurance proceeds he was owed on… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  inBaker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuworth, LLC v Comprehensive  Mental Assessment & Medical Care, P.C.; 2011 NY Slip Op 31385(U) ;May 10, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County ;Docket Number: 016008/2007; Judge: Ira B. . [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Yesterday at noon, with Dave Barshay of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC, sitting in his Jamaica, Queens offices, and I sitting in my Buffalo, New York offices, 127 time- and effort-vested members of the New York no-fault insurance and legal community participated in an open webinar discussion of the background, holding and impact of the New York Court of Appeals' then one-week-old decision in LMK Psychological Servs., P.C.… [read post]
28 May 2008, 4:33 pm
(NYC Civil, New York Co., decided 5/21/2008)The med billers over at Baker Sanders may want to tweak their form letters. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
Sanders (07-214) and Exxon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:30 am
  Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuworth, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:33 am
" Baker Sanders via Gottlieb's NFP is now declaring itself the winner on this issue, but Rogak won't concede, noting in his comment to that post that "[c]uriously, Judge Edwards did not address at all, in her 'clarification decision,' her earlier ruling that LMTs are not entitled to no-fault benefits. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
Sanders (07-1209) and Bell v. [read post]