Search for: "Baker v. State of Louisiana*" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Although supporters of that provision had urged the Supreme Court to uphold it, relying in part on Baker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
The ruling below, which upheld the state law, is reversed and remanded;" Giles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
In fact, Nevada specifically prohibits discrimination in “baker[ies]. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
  Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by John Baker
Baker Jr. is Professor Emeritus of Law at the Louisiana State University Law Center. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:52 am by Steven Cohen
Baker – United States District Court – Middle District of Louisiana – June 4th, 2019) involves a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:11 am
Baker Hostetler Partners Take Up States' Challenge of Health Care Overhaul The National Law Journal Baker Hostetler partners David Rivkin Jr. and Lee Casey have signed on as outside counsel to several state attorneys general who want the national health care legislation overturned in court. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am by Adam Feldman
Heller and reaffirmed this right vis-à-vis state laws in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Paul Karlsgodt is a partner in the Denver office of Baker Hostetler and editor and primary contributor to the legal blog www.classactionblawg.com. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Town of Chester v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Committee for Justice blog, Ashley Baker writes that “many of the initial reactions”  to Monday’s decision in Apple v. [read post]