Search for: "Baker v. Superior Court (1984)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2012, 3:25 pm
The Seventh Circuit, in Baker v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:29 am
Jeffrey B. (1984) 158 Cal. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 197, 213-214.) [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Nov. 30, 2010); Baker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:35 pm
Lee, 744 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir. 1984). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996); MacDonald v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Manriquez petitioned the superior court for a writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]