Search for: "Baker v. Young*"
Results 21 - 40
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:34 am
Baker View this document on Scribd [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:16 pm
That is the issue the Court granted on Monday in Setser v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
Williams v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm
Baker (1840), 3 Moo. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:11 am
Baker, suggesting that a certain set of studies is not worthy of consideration because it was “litigant-funded. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:45 am
Grant, 2009 SCC 32 Reference re Secession of Quebec, 1998 CanLII 793 (SCC), [1998] 2 SCR 217 Baker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:45 am
Grant, 2009 SCC 32 Reference re Secession of Quebec, 1998 CanLII 793 (SCC), [1998] 2 SCR 217 Baker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm
Tuohy lives in Arizona, and Baker lives in Massachusetts. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
First On 24 April 2015, Jeremy Baker J handed down judgment in Asghar & Mujahid v Ahmad, Ali, Bhutt and Hayat ([2015] EWHC 1118 (QB)). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am
Reviewing the case law, Justice Baker noted that since its 1977 decision in Schultz v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The chairman went to great lengths to ensure that the formalities of debate were meticulously observed Regular readers of this weblog will recall that, following the United Kingdom Supreme Court's recent decision to grant permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal's controversial ruling on the application of the "temporary copying" exception in NLA v Meltwater [2011] EWCA Civ 890 [noted by the IPKat here; criticised by Lionel Bently here], Baker… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 7:32 pm
The firm of Baker Botts filed the petition in the case of Vogelsberg v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 10:41 am
Friday marks the 110th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Lochner v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:36 am
Baker, suggesting that a certain set of studies is not worthy of consideration because it was “litigant-funded. [read post]
