Search for: "Baker v. Young*" Results 161 - 180 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Baker, which involved the effect of a voluntary dismissal on a plaintiff’s right to appeal a district-court order denying class certification. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am by Zachary Burdette
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare   Stewart Baker uploaded the latest episode of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
Stewart Baker interviewed Susan Landau about her new book “Listening In: Cybersecurity in an Insecure Age” in this week’s Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Darla Jackson
  On December 20, 1999 the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
’ …” he nevertheless undertook a review of other potential grounds of continuing entitlement, noting trial and appellate authority supporting the proposition that the phrase “other cause” in the Divorce Act’s definition of “child of the marriage” is to be interpreted broadly (see Baker v Baker, (1994) 2 RFL (4th) 147 (ABQB), Gamache v Gamache, 1999 ABQB 313 and Olson v Olson, 2003 ABCA 56). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Baker, two others granted that day) remained conspicuously absent from oral argument calendars through the end of 2016 and into the beginning of 2017. [read post]