Search for: "Baker v. Young" Results 21 - 40 of 274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Judgement on meaning was handed down by Mr Justice Griffiths in Smith v Baker [2022] EWHC 246 (QB) on 10 February 2022. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Aaron Kaufman
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm by Tia Sewell
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
In 2001, Miller Cassidy merged with Baker Botts, a larger, Texas-based firm, and Barrett spent another year there before leaving for academia. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  The bakers all turned down the jobs on the grounds that the message sent by the proposed cakes was offensive or hateful. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), this evocation of the racist bigot played a key role in arguments by baker Jack Phillips and his amici that he was a sincere man of faith who loved everyone. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
Arguing that a book is obscene helps evade First Amendment challenges, like the one at the center of Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
’ …” he nevertheless undertook a review of other potential grounds of continuing entitlement, noting trial and appellate authority supporting the proposition that the phrase “other cause” in the Divorce Act’s definition of “child of the marriage” is to be interpreted broadly (see Baker v Baker, (1994) 2 RFL (4th) 147 (ABQB), Gamache v Gamache, 1999 ABQB 313 and Olson v Olson, 2003 ABCA 56). [read post]