Search for: "Baker v. Young"
Results 161 - 180
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia ABC reports that South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young might be cross-examined about her sexual history during a defamation trial against former senator David Leyonhjelm Canada In the case of Lotin v Gregor 2019 ONSC 1510 it was held that defamatory statements made one of the defendants accusing the plaintiff of stealing money in a telephone conversation and a text message and awarded damages of Can$2,000. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Ohio (1961); Baker v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Ohio (1961); Baker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jermaine Young v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Instead, it was a statement by James Baker, then a spokesman for Republican presidential candidate George W. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
In the case of Young v Racing NSW [2019] NSWDC 662 Gibson DCJ struck out a claim for defamation and negligence claim. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
Baker, and Bret A. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Young, 2019 ONSC 326 the plaintiff was a doctor who had written to a local newspaper. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:02 am
As you may have seen, the jury in Marchuk v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
The court did recently deal with employment discrimination based on gender in Young v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:46 am
The famous case of Baker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:02 pm
Young and Magistrate Judge Tim A. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Its careful analysis of the variety of supposed technological solutions should be mandatory reading for legislators, and I would hope that, the next time a court is assessing the constitutionality of a relevant piece of legislation (as US courts did on a number of occasions re: filtering), that this material (assuming the already-infamous Footnote 17 in Exxon v Baker doesn’t prevent it) can be of assistance there, too. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Baker, et al., 137 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
In Monroe v. [read post]
