Search for: "Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court Holds that Inclusion of a "Supercenter" in a Project Does Not Automatically Mean Urban Decay Impacts Must Be Studied
31 Mar 2010, 8:52 am by Meyers Nave
City of Madera, the Fifth Appellate District revisited the issue of evaluation of the environmental impacts of “Supercenters” under CEQA addressed previously in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
Public Blawg - http://www.publiclawnews.com/blogs/public-blawg
Subsequent EIRs: It is Still a Matter of the Evidence in the Record
31 Mar 2010, 1:07 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The trial court denied the writ petition.The opponent’s primary argument, based upon the decisions in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supercenters Do Not Automatically Trigger Requirement To Study Urban Decay Effects In An EIR
30 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm
Melom appealed, claiming that Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
First District Reaffirms CEQA Is Concerned With Physical Impacts On The Environment, Not Economic Ones On Government Services
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Reaffirms CEQA Is Concerned With Physical Impacts On The Environment, Not Economic Ones On Government Services
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Don't Procrastinate: Make Your Comments on Environmental Analyses Early and Often
30 Sep 2011, 1:56 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
” Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
Aviation and Airport Development Law - http://www.aviationairportdevelopmentlaw.com/
Fifth District Holds Cap-And-Trade Program Compliance Supports Refinery Project EIR’s Conclusion That GHG Emissions Are Less Than Significant, Also Addresses Important CEQA Baseline and Railroad Operation Preemption Issues
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Keeping CEQA In Its Lane: First District Holds Substantial Evidence Supports EIR’s Conclusion That “Urban Decay” Is Not Reasonably Foreseeable Indirect Effect Of Project Relocating Trial Court Operations From Historic Placerville Courthouse
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Does Not Require City’s General Plan Update EIR to Address Urban Decay Based on Broker’s Speculative Opinion Concerning Effects of Commercial Tenant Square Footage Cap
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In reaching these conclusions, and in distinguishing its prior decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 MID-YEAR CEQA UPDATE
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Tomlinson v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2014 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
               EXEMPTIONS Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2010 CEQA UPDATE
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Tomlinson v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court distinguished Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Connecting The CEQA Dots? Supreme Court Holds Friant Ranch Project EIR’s Air Quality Impacts Discussion Insufficiently Relates Pollutant Data To Specific Adverse Human Health Effects
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Rejects CEQA And Fair Transit Hearing Challenges To LA Metro’s Westside Subway Extension Project In Lengthy Published Opinion
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” (Citing Western Placer Citizens for an Agricultural & Rural Environment v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA Challenge To Shooting Range Project On City-Owned Land In Unincorporated County Was Not Mooted By Project’s Construction During Trial Court Proceedings Despite Petitioner’s Failure To Seek Preliminary Injunction
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Rejects SMARA And CEQA Challenges To Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment And Related EIR
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” (Quoting Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com