Search for: "Bakke v. Regents of University of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 37 years since the Supreme Court decided its first major case concerning race-based affirmative action in higher education, Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
Strawbridge urged the justices to overrule Grutter and Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
The argument was in University of California Regents v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
Unless the next two Supreme Court appointees are strong opponents of racial preferences — a most unlikely prospect — the Court’s role since the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am
For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
” Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am
California Board of Regents. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Virginia (1967) Module 10: Affirmative Action on the Burger and Rehnquist Courts Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
” The “diversity” standard in college admissions has gained great popularity because advocates of race-based affirmative action, stymied by the Court since Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
BakkeIn Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
The problem is that the reasons cited by academics – like past societal discrimination or the need for more minority professionals – have already been rejected as unconstitutional in Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:25 am
He published many articles both in technical law journals and also in the New York Review of Books, none more important than his critique in several articles in 1977 and 1978 of the supreme court's inconclusive decision of the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case, which arose out of widespread dissatisfaction with "affirmative action", or positive discrimination. [read post]
