Search for: "Bakke v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 299 (1978). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 299 (1978). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
Instead, following this Court’s guidance in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Since its 1978 decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Bakke decision. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Bakke (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
And while he seems more open to embracing a positive vision of race and thinking about the state's inevitable role in constructing identity, his vision may also be more tied to context and less generalizable across cases.In my view, the story of Kennedy's opinion in the desegregation cases began not with Bakke or Grutter, but with a voting-rights decision issued last year in a case called League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Bakke (1978) and Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Bakke (1978) Gratz v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
And in Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:08 am
State of Karnataka, Indira Sawhney and the US decisions of Grutter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
Bakke 1978 decision which struck down race exclusive quotas as violative of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm
" Cummings v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm
As Justice Samuel Alito commented in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Bakke (1978), Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Bakke (1978), Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Yet while Merrill v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court watchers could be forgiven if last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
