Search for: "Ball v. Carr*" Results 1 - 20 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
  [Ball 1 incorrectly called a strike, strike 1 incorrectly called a ball, balls 3 and 4 correctly called balls, strike 2 incorrectly called a ball: batter walks.] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:57 am
[Oct. 8]Reuters made it appear that Glaxo had carried the ball, rather than noting that Tafas was there first:During the Bush administration, the Patent Office had set rules aimed at limiting the size of patent applications in hopes of reducing the time it takes to grant or reject a patent, now at about three years.But Glaxo and other companies objected and sued the office seeking that the rules be overturned.Reuters also wrote:The rules had been designed to force companies to… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:17 am by lawmrh
See, for instance, “The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections”, “Voters v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Betty Lupinacci
The stands are full of families, with children carrying gloves in the hopes of snagging a foul ball or, better yet, a home run ball! [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]