Search for: "Ball v. Carr*"
Results 1 - 20
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2019, 2:24 am
In the cases of Clarke v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:28 am
Ball St. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
-- 'Golden Balls'. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
In Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
Ball State University. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
Lang v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
[Ball 1 incorrectly called a strike, strike 1 incorrectly called a ball, balls 3 and 4 correctly called balls, strike 2 incorrectly called a ball: batter walks.] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:57 am
[Oct. 8]Reuters made it appear that Glaxo had carried the ball, rather than noting that Tafas was there first:During the Bush administration, the Patent Office had set rules aimed at limiting the size of patent applications in hopes of reducing the time it takes to grant or reject a patent, now at about three years.But Glaxo and other companies objected and sued the office seeking that the rules be overturned.Reuters also wrote:The rules had been designed to force companies to… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Gayler v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:17 am
See, for instance, “The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections”, “Voters v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:15 am
Slovik v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
Co. v North Am. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
In Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
In the recent case of Smith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:44 am
The stands are full of families, with children carrying gloves in the hopes of snagging a foul ball or, better yet, a home run ball! [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:05 am
Yesterday we discussed the legal malpractice aspect of Billiard Balls Mgt. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
In the case of Rosenthal v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]