Search for: "Ball v. Industrial Commission"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm
In fact, it could be a low-ball estimate. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for European… [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
Our crystal ball predictions for GDPR enforcement would be that the initial focus by the regulators will be on the highlighted products or services. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
Industry sought to challenge these Findings. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, about whether an “artist” (here, a website designer) can be compelled to perform work celebrating a same-sex wedding that is inconsistent with their sincerely held religious beliefs. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
By Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer Last Friday, Common Sense Media (CSM) held an event (video) at the National Press Club featuring the chairmen of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
This approach would avoid the risks of crystal ball-gazing. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
Ball, Jane S. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
What’s the price of being behind the eight-ball? [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
RPX uses a definition that includes the first five CKS categories plus category 7 plus operating companies that sue outside of their industry (not counted in CKS). [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
We’re talking about royal commission transcripts. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am
Zetoony: are there industries where it’s harder to provide substantiation? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am
The whistleblower provisions include the creation of a new whistleblower bounty pursuant to which individuals who bring violations of securities and commodities laws to the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission will receive between 10 percent and 30 percent of any recovery in excess of $1 million. ? [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
The ball of judicial salaries is in the legislative "court. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The story so far Following the Leveson Inquiry into phone-hacking and other misconduct by the newspaper industry, the rather feeble Press Complaints Commission was abandoned. [read post]
