Search for: "Ball v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Smith (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Today’s guest post is courtesy of Reed Smith’s Lindsey Harteis. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:38 am
The match-up was a classic one, my firm against Akin Gump: BigLaw v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 223 (2008) 11 138 Smith, Henry E. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
A federal district court in California held that triable fact issues existed as to whether he was qualified for any of the four potential positions, whether his employer could have invoked the “special situations” provision of the union contract to override the seniority system, and whether it failed to engage in the interactive process by having only one meeting with him and interviewing him for only one job (Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 10:19 pm
She corresponded with Keira V. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Though the audio equipment did not play ball, the speakers battled on bravely; Alden Bowers of Wildy’s and Alex Smith of LexisNexis had very interesting things to say about the survival of hard copy law books and the Big Data future respectively. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
Even so, we’re hopeful that in one of the pending lawsuits challenging the program, including EFF’s case Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:10 pm
• Types IV, V and VI. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
But when he hits the ball, it goes long. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
Never too late 31 [week ending Sunday 1 February] -- Women in IP, a MIP’s perspective | Another linking reference to the CJEU | Catarina Holtz on Disciplinary authority over the EPO BoA | EPO pays to say that patent examiners’ life is truly cool | You can’t name your daughter ‘Nutella’ | CJEU in Arne Forsgren v Österreichisches Patentamt | Blocking injunctions in Greece | IPEC and bondage in Haiss… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Laura Smith-Hewitt… is categorically is an examiner -- some readers should get over it. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
In the recent case of Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Smith, 131 P.2d 36 (Cal. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:08 am
Despite risk of retaliation, Tatyana and the other plaintiffs in Fields v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
