Search for: "Ball v. USA"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Government’s Exhibit List USA v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that after last week’s oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:05 pm
Even with this low-ball estimate, Obama can see that hospitals kill more people than terrorists. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
At the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin covers Reichle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:26 am
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. for FBT Securitization Trust 2005-3, 219 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017); Rivera v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:26 am
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. for FBT Securitization Trust 2005-3, 219 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017); Rivera v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
USA, Inc., No. 06-0282-CB-M, 2007 U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
But will we keep our eye on the ball? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Rentmeester says Nike then used his carefully choreographed picture using Jordan's left hand to 'slam dunk' the ball, to recreate the shot with Jordan in Bulls gear with the Chicago skyline in the background, but that it was essentially still his work and his suit says "Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:41 am
COM decisionSupreme Court Decisions: Supreme Court Sends BOOKING.COM Attorney's Fees Ruling Back to Fourth Circuit In View of Peter v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:47 pm
He needs to get on the ball and make it out to the other three! [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
In Barnhill v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
”The case is Rentmeester v Nike Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
Mitre Sports International claimed that its reputation was damaged in a report that featured children stitching Mitre soccer balls. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
Memphis totally dominated Mississippi statistically but still lost 23-21, not being able to put the ball into the end zone and turning the ball over five times. [read post]
