Search for: "Ballew v. United States" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:25 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]