Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  The Fourteenth Amendment, as understood by Republicans in Congress, gave the national government the power to ensure that state governments both protected and equally protected the fundamental rights of all persons in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel Rigsby, 15-513, has its origins in Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:43 am by Michelle Kisloff and Vassi Iliadis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued its opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
’ However, the Dictionary Act, 1 U.S Code § 1, which defines terms used in the United States Code `unless the context indicates otherwise,’ specifies that the word `person’ includes `corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
”The appeals court described the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
First Union National Bank, 486 F.3d 150, 156 (6th Cir. 2007) (credit reporting and related state-law claims) ($400,000); Cummings, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Justin Hemmings, Nathan Swire
PPD-28 is binding on the executive branch, however, and codifies the long-standing historical policy of the United States to collect intelligence in order to allow the government to make decisions concerning “foreign, defense and economic policy, and the protection of United States national interests from foreign security threats,” while drawing the line at aiding private corporations. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Why the Hobby Lobby Reasoning Is Dangerous to Hobby Lobby’s Bottom Line and to the United States The Hobby Lobby reasoning is also a hazard for for-profit companies, as Chick-Fil-A has learned the hard way. [read post]