Search for: "Bank One, N.A. v Friedman"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Bank N.A. v Brown, 186 AD3d 1038, 1039 [4th Dept 2020]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Further, extrinsic evidence may not be considered where, as here, the contract is unambiguous (Matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 198 AD3d 156, 163 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 998 [2022]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Further, extrinsic evidence may not be considered where, as here, the contract is unambiguous (Matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 198 AD3d 156, 163 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 998 [2022]). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 85 N.Y.2d 20, 24-25 (1995). [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
As the Attorney Defendants admit, under Texas law, "the time period within which one must sue to recover a debt . . . is also the same period within which one must sue to foreclose upon the lien [securing that debt]. [read post]
