Search for: "Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Bank of America Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2023, Florida enacted FL HB 3, a law entitled “Government and Corporate Activism” that became effective on July 1, 2023. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
Kennedy et al FLSD   Other   Civil Rights Americans   with Disabilities Act   Boehm et al v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
BANK OF NEW YORK as successor in interest of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee on behalf of SAMI 2006-AR-3, Appellee. 4th District.Construction: ROOFING CONTRACTOR MUST WEATHER DAMAGES JUDGMENT WITHOUT COVERAGE, Evanston Ins. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Bank of America, N.A. et al., No. 1:10-cv-05332, contending that the affidavits established that class members would claim to have worked enough overtime hours on average to meet the $5 million requirement for diversity jurisdiction. [read post]