Search for: "Bank of America v. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 8:09 am by Ted Frank
[WaPo] SEC class action against Bank of America punishes shareholders for being victims. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs allege that, at the outset, Baker suggested to Fields that they could treat the Mortgages as “pocket mortgages” by holding them in escrow with Baker as the escrow agent, without publicly recording them, to avoid any default being accelerated and called by Bank of America, which already held mortgages on the Wyoming Property (id. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Vitolo] Roberts joins liberals to hold 5-3 that cities can sue alleging Fair Housing Act violations; damages theories are to be constrained, though [Josh Blackman, SCOTUSBlog roundup on Bank of America v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Bank of America v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm by law shucks
Heller Ehrman Settles With Bank of America, Citibank | AmLaw Daily – What’s interesting here is that this is fixing a huge mistake by BofA, which terminated its security interest, allegedly by accident. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:22 am
Baker, unlike numerous law professors in the intellectual property area, understood that not all inventions are innovative, and certainly that invention and innovation are not synonyms. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:11 am by Anushka Limaye
Matthew Kahn posted the Oct. 1 joint unclassified filings in the Qassim v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
’” Heinz, 246 F.3d at 715 (quoting Philadelphia Nat’l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363); see also Baker Hughes, 908 F.2d at 982. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]