Search for: "Bank of Delaware v. Bank of Delaware"
Results 141 - 160
of 937
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2021, 6:56 pm
Julian v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
” Another is the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2015 decision in the Carlisle case where Vice Chancellor Laster held that the assignee of an LLC membership interest, who as a non-member lacked standing to seek dissolution under the Delaware LLC Act, nonetheless could seek dissolution under the Chancery Court’s common-law authority as a court of equity. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the Delaware Chancery Court rejected a seller’s claims that it was entitled to cash held in the target’s bank account that it neglected to withdraw prior to the closing of its sale of the target’s stock. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
In Weingarten v Kopelowitz, 2020 NY Slip Op 51260(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2020], the plaintiff brought suit individually and derivatively on behalf of a Delaware LLC in which he held a one-third membership agreement after he was terminated as property manager of multi-unit rental properties in Tennessee owned indirectly by the LLC. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
M&T Bank Corp., 962 F.3d 701, 717 (3d Cir. 2020). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
Lebanese Canadian Bank, 960 N.Y.S.2d 695 (2012) and Pichardo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
At a hearing on that motion last month, Delaware U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
The petition argues that the Third Circuit's decision, if left standing, will expose public companies to significant, hindsight-based liability (M&T Bank Corporation v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:06 am
This precedent was established in the 2013 case Dawson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Banking Corp., 79 AD3d 805 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Laws using this language were enacted in Mississippi (1839), Iowa (1850), the Nebraska Territory (1855), Illinois (1871), and Delaware (1881). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
GXP Capital, LLC v. [read post]
