Search for: "Bank v. Cooper" Results 81 - 100 of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2017, 5:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Among other things, Conway briefed and argued (and won) Morrison v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:08 pm
A recent example of such litigation appeared in the case Herskovitz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
In Security Pacific National Bank v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
Meanwhile, the FTC has filed a lawsuit in the District of Nevada, FTC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:44 am by Vishnu S
Swarnim Shrivastava Supreme Court gives more teeth to the Tax Authority The Supreme Court in Kathiroor Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
All can be heard in New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew Cooper’s May 18, 2020 decision in Chu v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
So, then we come to the decision in National Westminster Bank v Kotonou. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 11:21 pm
Lim, The Function of the Transnational Chinese Contract Hao Zhang, The Carbon Externality of Investments Financed by China’s Development Banks: The Case of Energy Investments in Central Asia Sergey S. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:41 pm
Not wanting to waste a good rant, I feel compelled to follow up Saturday's screed about the posting by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors of Watters v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:45 pm by Hannah Meakin (UK)
On 8 November 2021, the Bank of England (BoE) issued a Consultation Paper and a draft Statement of Policy on its approach to ‘tiering’ non-UK central counterparties (CCPs) based on the level of systemic risk they could pose to UK financial stability. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:48 am by Sophia Tang
In Cathay United Bank v Gao, Shanghai High Court, (2016) Hu Min Xia Zhong No 99, the appellant, a Taiwan commercial bank, and the respondent, a Chinese citizen resident in Shanghai, entered into a Guarantee contract. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am by The Complex Litigator
The crux of a Title VII inquiry is “the reason for a particular employment decision,” Cooper v. [read post]