Search for: "Bankers Trust Company v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to… [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
There are some unique facts here, but in insider trading lingo, trading based on confidential info from an employer looks a lot like “misappropriation” – which the Supreme Court upheld as a theory of liability in 1997, in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm by charlesgriffin
Lymas contends that the damage caps violate the Mississippi Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
” The investment bankers successfully challenged the first-gen laws in a series of lawsuits in Federal District Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Although it seemed that the audience was united in approval of the principle of that decision, there was plenty for discussion in the detail of precisely what was ordered, why, how and who was to pay for it.What is the role of EU law? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
” Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
The current position seems to be that Bankers Trust orders may be granted against third parties out of the jurisdiction in cases of “hot pursuit” such as fraud though the position regarding NPOs remains less clear. [5] In Wang v Darby[6], the court for the first time considered whether cryptocurrencies could be held on trust. [read post]