Search for: "Banks v. Housing Authority"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 8:19 am
McCusker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
Authorizes the issuance of an additional $11 billion in tax-exempt bonds in calendar year 2008, the proceeds of which can be used to provide loans to first-time homebuyers and finance construction of affordable rental housing. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:55 pm
Bank v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:36 am
Supreme Court decision, Atherton v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am
The representative also said the SEC does not need additional authority to act on climate risk. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:23 am
Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:59 am
HSBC Bank v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
The House of Lords held that the illegality defence applied. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Deutsche Bank. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
[4] In an earlier article, the authors provided a full discussion of the FDIC investigation process, see Claims Against Bank Officers and Directors Arising from the Financial Crisis, The Review of Banking & Financial Services, Vol. 26 2010 [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:52 am
The inmate had been suspended from attending chapel services because he was involved in posting unauthorized flyers in inmate housing units.In Justus v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:07 pm
Bank National Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:05 pm
San Francisco Housing Authority (1st Dist. 2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 564, fn. 6.) [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
