Search for: "Banks v. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
Enron’s credit lines dried up and the “run on the bank” was on. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
It does so by establishing a limited system for case-by-case oversight in which judicial review of the substantive merits of those decisions is avoided. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
While some may believe the idea of a lawsuit is unhelpful – the claims are not frivolous or without merit, instead they raise important questions for the courts and society to address.1. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Air Climate Systems, Inc. and All Climate Systems, Inc. (30-CA-17695; 352 NLRB No. 75) Janesville, WI May 30, 2008. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
Chevron USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
National Australia Bank at the Conglomerate. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 7:46 am
The fees were received by the EPO on 12 November 2018.V. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
The FDIC board acted based on the recommendation of an administrative law judge who was removable by the federal Merit Systems Protection Board only for cause; the MSPB is in turn itself removable by the president only for cause. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
v=mHV4nDS501Y -- afforded reason enough to suspect something along these lines even before the latest Republican volte face on the individual mandate. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Among the many questions that have arisen in the FDIC’s failed bank cases as individual defendants have tried to rely on the protection of the business judgment rule is whether or not the defense protects officers as well as directors (about which refer here) or whether it affords less protection to the directors and officers of banks than it does to corporate officials at other kinds of companies (about which refer here). [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Merit Systems Protection Board ................................ [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
The appellate court concluded that the bank’s exculpatory bylaw provision protected the directors. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:21 am
Office of Special Counsel (OSC) had a busy week with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the tribunal to which many government employees appeal adverse actions — often without help from lawyers. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
