Search for: "Banks v. Turner et al" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
 G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through  - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
 G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through  - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank have indicated that they are cooperating with various regulators. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
Janvey, in his capacity as Court Appointed Receiver For the Stanford International Bank Limited, et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
(Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.) [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:46 am
Review Board, et al (NFP) - "Claimant-Appellant Adam W. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]