Search for: "Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sixth District Reverses Writ, Upholds Responsible Agency Monterey County’s Approval of Desalination Plant In Reliance on CPUC’s EIR For Multi-Component, Cross-Jurisdictional Water Supply Project; Court Rejects CEQA Challenges Based On County’s Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent EIR and Allegedly Inadequate Statement of Overriding Considerations
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Addresses Significant CEQA Issues In Mixed Decision On Placer County’s EIR For Specific Plan/Rezoning Allowing Development of Martis Valley Timberlands
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Court further explained that, unlike the position of responsible agency occupied by the Coastal Commission in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Holds Coastal Commission’s Post-Approval Analysis of Coastal Development Permit’s Environmental Impacts Violates CEQA
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
California Coastal Com. (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 563, 577, fn. 8; La Costa Beach Homeowners’ Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  McCann v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Sauce For The Gander”: Second District Holds CEQA’s Broad Definition Of “Project” Also Applies In Determining Scope of Activity To Which Statutory Exemption Applies
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court also held “[t]he agreement is not a separate project under [the analysis of] Banning Ranch [Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Past Year In CEQA Case Law: A Quick Look Back at 2017
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In decided cases, the Supreme Court held in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2017 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Brian Russell
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2017 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen, Brian Russell and Daniel S. Cucchi
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2017 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen, Brian Russell and Daniel S. Cucchi
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2017 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2017 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
         UPDATE Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Sixth District Rejects “Piecemealing” and Other CEQA Challenges to Ordinances Enacted Pursuant to Santa Cruz County’s Zoning Modernization Effort
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Quoting Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Supreme Court Holds Banning Ranch EIR Violates CEQA by Failing to Identify and Analyze Coastal Zone Project’s Impacts on Potential Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA); Declines to Reach General Plan Issues
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2016 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Newport Beach, S227473. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2016 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Newport Beach, S227473. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2016 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Newport Beach, S227473. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2015 CEQA ANNUAL REVIEW
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  The case, Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2015 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Return of Banning Ranch: The Spurned Responsible Agency
12 Aug 2015, 11:40 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Newport Beach (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 1341 (“Banning Ranch II”). [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/