Search for: "Bar Medical Holdings II LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am by Dennis Crouch
” Valeant contends the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that IPRs do not qualify as public disclosures under either subsection (i) or (ii). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
A week later, limited partners holding 74% of the partnership interests in the L.P. by written consent appointed an LLC under their control named Cheloniidae LLC as new general partner. [read post]
  Among other things, the Task Force will produce a comprehensive report that will include: (i) guiding principles; (ii) forward-looking recommendations; and (iii) bipartisan policy proposals. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
  The Supreme Court announced that it would hold its “mop up” conference for October Term 2022 on Thursday, after completing the day’s opinion announcements. [read post]
GoodRX Holdings, Inc., Criteo Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc., and Google LLC,  plaintiffs filed suit against a number of defendants in the Northern District of California asserting claims under CIPA, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (“CMIA”), California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and common law invasion of privacy claims. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Northstar Spectrum, LLC), we see that Jeff Lamken argued against Seth Waxman, and that other legal heavyweights were on the respective briefs. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Our holding should also be of special interest to those concerned with the evolution of surveillance by state actors or by those purporting to act at their direction. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am by Richard Hunt
Aimbridge Hospitality LLC holds water, but if the plaintiffs/DOJ prevail everything I’ve said about experts may be wrong. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Samantha Zipper
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that plaintiff’s Title II claim was barred by the CDA, because the Court, “found no authority, and [plaintiff] fails to cite any authority, holding that Title II … provides an exception to the immunity afforded to Facebook under the CDA. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:35 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
§ 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A); Failed to have a HIPAA security training program, and failed to provide security training to its employees. [read post]