Search for: "Barber v. Powell"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2008, 8:04 am
Barber v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
We thank Philip Barber of Zenith Chambers for providing us with a transcript of the judgment. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
We thank Philip Barber of Zenith Chambers for providing us with a transcript of the judgment. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
So, all of this was really bad practice and procedurally irregular – and the HHJ clearly has Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51 in mind.Southwark did not help themselves either. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
So, all of this was really bad practice and procedurally irregular – and the HHJ clearly has Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51 in mind.Southwark did not help themselves either. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
Lett, Barber v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm
Jefferson Powell. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
Only last year, the Illinois Supreme Court decided a precursor of Symczyk's issue presented, Barber v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Wood v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
Lewisham had acted in breach of its own policy.Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The question presented is whether that claim prevails on plain error review so long as there is "any possibility" the defendant was convicted for conduct prior to the statute's adoption, or whether a more stringent standard applies. ------- Title: Barber v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
