Search for: "Barbour, Appeal of" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm by John Richards
This power exists to give convicted criminals one final avenue of appeal when they have exhausted all the remedies afforded to them by the court system. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Barry, 144 F.3d 847, 850 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1998), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit noted that the reasoning in Suter would extend to other provisions of the AACWA. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:35 am
Barbour had a history of mental illness. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:37 am by Todd Zywicki
  If she runs for President in 2012 and she gets matched up with others who have worn the mantle of executive decisionmaking but also have greater knowledge to back it up (Romney, Huckabee, Pawlenty, Barbour), her distinct appeal compared to the 2008 general election field will be less prominent. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm by Jon Sands
On appeal, the government argues that the Indictment had a separate number and that the date ran from arraignment. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:02 am by David Harlow
  Today, Judge Vinson stayed the effect of his decision invalidating the law, so long as the Administration files its appeal within seven days.) [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd. [(1942) 2 ALL ER 122 (HL)]:"......Any civilized system of law is bound to provide remedies for cases of what has been called unjust enrichment or unjust benefit, that is, to prevent a man from retaining the money of, or some benefit derived from, another which it is against conscience that he should keep. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ February 18 conference. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Chris Castle
 Not surprisingly, Hood appealed and even less surprisingly the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Judge Wingate’s injunction (which means the injunction goes away, probably as though it had never been issued. [read post]