Search for: "Bardwell, in the Matter of"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
It was a no win situation for Judge Harrison and he was going to be under the microscope and criticized no matter what he did. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:55 pm
I should note that, as a practical matter, this isn’t much of a burden on the couples, since they can easily find a different Justice of the Peace to issue the license. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:27 am
Bardwell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
No matter where you practice law or what kind of law it is, it's probably a good idea to take a look at the case reports at least once a decade, because the law, it do change occasionally. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
It doesn't matter. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:21 am
Another friend and fellow blogger, Tom Freeland (NMissCommentor), has also posted a detailed discussion about the matter. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:06 pm
As noted by Will Bardwell, the reversal was based on a technicality where the trial court considered evidence outside the pleadings without converting the 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:37 am
Some readers suggest that Judge Wilkerson’s speech was less constitutionally protected than Judge Osborne’s because Osborne’s speech was part of an election campaign and Wilkerson’s wasn’t; see also this post at Will Bardwell’s blog. [read post]
