Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 181 - 200 of 4,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm by Eric Guttag
In a decision barely reaching 11 pages, a unanimous Supreme Court in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:14 am
PipeBomb.jpg In prosecution for conspiring to make and making a pipe bomb, demonstrative video showing three tests, played at three different speeds, was probative to show the devices were "destructive devices" and were not unfairly prejudicial based on the "bare allegation" that the bombs in the video were significantly different than the charged devices, in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:36 am
iStock_000000130176.jpg In child pornography prosecution, detective's lay or expert testimony that images on the defendant's computer media satisfied the legal definition of child pornography was not helpful to the jury since it was only a "bare conclusion"; however its admission was not plain error based on the defense concession in closing argument that the photos were pornographic and that the defense only denied producing the photos, in United… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:42 am by Thomas & Pearl
Jeg var der du bare er for kort tid siden, nå er jeg der Mange flere webansvarlige vil være, bli med meg. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:45 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A motion for a temporary injunction opens the record and gives the court authority to pass upon the sufficiency of the underlying pleading.Student note: However, this power does not extend to an evaluation of conflicting evidence, and so the motion court may not, on its own initiative, convert a motion for a preliminary injunction into one for summary judgment without giving adequate notice to the parties and affording them an opportunity to lay bare their proof.Case: Grand… [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:05 pm
Já estão disponíveis no canal do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) no YouTube os vídeos referentes às participações de especialistas e interessados na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI 4103) em que a Associação Brasileira de Bares e Restaurantes (Abrasel) questiona dispositivos da Lei Seca (Lei 11.705/2008). [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Losing causes.The First Department affirmed defendant's motion to dismiss, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), (5) and (7), in Langer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” The Supreme Court barely contemplated the text’s meaning in Heller v. [read post]